The Atlantic was once again at the center of controversy this week, this time over freelance pay. Freelance journalist Nate Thayer published an email exchange with the magazine's newly-hired global editor, who asked to republish a recent story by Thayer without paying him. "We unfortunately can't pay you for it, but we do reach 13 million readers a month," she wrote.
Thayer's blog post caused a social media firestorm, prompting editor-in-chief James Bennet to release a statement clarifying that The Atlantic always pays for "original, reported work by freelancers" and apologizing for offending Thayer.
Back at The Atlantic, Alexis Madrigal sprung to the defense of his colleague and said that when it comes down to it, the numbers just don't add up the way they used to: the business of digital media can't support writers the way print media once did.
Wonkette adds: "Let us all take a step back and appreciate exactly where we are right now: we are in a place wherein paying people for their work has become a topic worthy of debate and discussion."
"If anybody out there thinks a paywall is going to solve our industry's problems in itself, they're in for a very rude surprise." The Wall Street Journal's Raju Narisetti talks with the Nieman Journalism Lab about paywalls and reinventing ads.
There's an exception for finance, of course, and also for the NYT, which is unique in many ways. But the lesson of Palmer's [TED] talk is that while 25,000 supporters aren't nearly enough to support a band on a record label, they're more than enough to support a band on Kickstarter -- or, for that matter, to keep an iPad magazine going strong. What's more, while consumers can be very loyal to brands and to publications, in many ways it's easier to become loyal to an individual, especially when she has an idiosyncratic and unique voice.
These efforts should give publishers the shivers, because this new channel represents a major threat to the retail lineage that constitutes half of what's left of the advertising sold by newspapers.